4.2 Article

Chromosome aberrations and telomere length modulation in bone marrow and spleen cells of melphalan-treated p53+/- mice

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 467-475

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/em.20405

关键词

telomere; chromosome aberration; p53 +/- mice; melphalan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The p53 gene regulates cell cycle and apoptotic pathways after induction of DNA damage. Telomeres, capping chromosome ends, are involved in maintaining chromosome stability; alterations of their length have been related to increased levels of chromosomal aberrations. To study a possible interaction between chromosome aberrations, telomere dysfunction, and p53, we investigated via painting analysis the induction and persistence of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow and spleen cells of p53+/- (and wild type) mice exposed for 4, 13, or 26 weeks to 2 mg/kg melphalan (MLP), a chemotherapeutic agent with carcinogenic potential. In addition, telomere length was evaluated in bone marrow cells by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH). Chromosome aberrations were significantly increased in both tissues after MLP treatment. The p53 genotype did not influence the response of spleen cells, whereas a slight but significant increase of the aberration frequency was measured in the bone marrow of P53+/- mice exposed to MLP for 13 weeks with respect to the level detected in the matched wild-type group. The main finding of our still preliminary results on telomere length modulation was again a difference between the two genotypes. In bone marrow cells of wild-type mice, MLP treatment was associated with telomere shortening, while in p53+/- mice telomere elongation was the prevalent response to MLP exposure. In agreement with previous literature data, our in vivo study suggests that even the lack of a single functional copy of the p53 gene might have an impact on the quantity and quality of chromosome alterations induced in cycling cells by a clastogenic exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据