4.7 Article

Poplar nutrition under drought as affected by ectomycorrhizal colonization

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 89-98

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.01.006

关键词

Ectomycorrhiza; Drought; Poplar; Stable isotope; Stress marker genes; Tree nutrition

资金

  1. European Commission [FP7-211917]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nutrient status and physiological responses to drought were investigated in young poplar (Populus x canescens) trees, which were either non-mycorrhizal (NM) or colonized with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus (EM). Stomatal conductance declined rapidly with limited water availability indicating that P. x canescens is a strongly water-saving tree species. EM trees showed higher stomatal conductance than NM trees but the magnitude of the effect was very small. Nitrogen uptake was traced by N-15. N-15 enrichment was higher in EM root tips than in NM root tips. The N-15 enrichment in root tips and in roots was significantly linked with stomatal conductance, whereas the enrichment in leaves was correlated with the enrichment in roots, indicating that N uptake is influenced by photosynthetic processes and that the internal translocation to leaves depends on the concentration in the below-ground tissues. Phosphorus and cations, in particular the main osmolyte potassium K, were enriched leaves of EM plants, but not in roots. Under drought, K and Mg increased in roots regardless the EM status, whereas the foliar concentrations increased only in EM plants. A decline in the leaf water content was prevented by increases in both, cations and soluble sugars. EM also delayed root tip mortality compared with NM plants, thus, suggesting transiently positive effects of EM on poplar performance under drought. Under stronger stress at water potentials of about -1.1 MPa, the transcript levels of stress marker genes (aquaporin PIP2.5, ABA-responsive RD26, ammonium.transporter AMT3.1) were increased regardless the mycorrhizal status of the trees. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据