4.7 Article

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulate the leaf transcriptome of a Populus alba L. clone grown on a zinc and copper-contaminated soil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 25-35

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.08.012

关键词

cDNA-AFLP; Gene expression; Transcriptome analysis; Glomus mosseae; Glomus intraradices; Heavy metals; Mycorrhiza; Poplar

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for Education
  2. University and Scientific Research [2003077418]
  3. Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea Protection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Significant improvement of growth associated with increased, rather than decreased, uptake of Cu and Zn has been observed in poplar plants inoculated with Glomus spp. as compared with non-mycorrhizal plants. The beneficial effect exerted by these arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is likely to be controlled by specific gene expression patterns in the plant. Until now, however, very little is known about the transcriptional changes which occur in response to heavy metals (HMs) in mycorrhizal vs. non-mycorrhizal poplar plants. In order to identify such HM- and/or AMF-induced changes in leaves of white poplar (Populus alba L.) plants grown, in the greenhouse, on Cu- and Zn-polluted soil, the cDNA-Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) approach was adopted, resulting in the identification of a number of new differentially regulated genes. Transcript derived fragments (TDFs) mostly belonged to stress-related functional categories of defence and secondary metabolism. Genes belonging to different functional categories, plus other genes known to be related to HM stress (metallothioneins, phytochelatin synthase, glutathione synthase, arginine decarboxylase), were analysed by quantitative (q)RT-PCR. Transcript levels were generally down-regulated, or unaffected, in polluted soil compared with controls, the main exceptions being phytochelatin synthase and clathrin, and strongly up-regulated in the presence of AMF, especially Glomus mosseae. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据