4.7 Article

Allocation and remobilisation of nitrogen in spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Mozart) as affected by N supply and elevated CO2

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 12-22

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.03.015

关键词

N-15; C:N ratios; Nitrogen use efficiency; Source-sink relationships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 enrichment interacts with the resource economy of plants, but time-integrated studies on N partitioning between different plant parts, C:N ratios and N remobilisation are mostly lacking. The present study addressed the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in spring oilseed rape (OSR) grown at three N fertilisation levels and two CO2 concentrations (380 vs. 5501 mu mol mol(-1)). N was supplied in three equal gifts at sowing, stem elongation and flowering. One of these gifts was labelled with (NH4NO3)-N-15-N-15 respectively. Six intermediate harvests and a final harvest were performed to determine dry mass, N concentrations, C:N, N recovery and delta N-15 signatures in the plant fractions root, main stem, branches, green and senescent leaves, pod walls and seeds. While N concentrations were lower and C:N higher in green leaves under CO2 enrichment, more N remained in the root until the final harvest. Under ambient CO2 concentrations the harvestable product (seeds) contained 50.7%, 44.5% and 41% of the total N supplied in the treatments that received 75, 150 and 225 kg ha(-1) N, respectively. Under elevated CO2 these values decreased to 47.4%, 34.5% and 15% reducing the NUE of the seeds by 2%, 33% and 65%, respectively. In CO2 exposed amply fertilised plants much of the N remained in the side stems due to strong outbranching and reduced seed set. However, N remobilisation was more affected by the different N supply than by the CO2 enrichment. The boosted growth of OSR under high availability of N disrupted the source:sink relationships so that benefits from the CO2 enrichment on stem and root growth could not be realised by yield formation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据