4.8 Article

A case-control study of urinary levels of iodine, perchlorate and thiocyanate and risk of papillary thyroid cancer

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 388-393

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.024

关键词

Papillary thyroid cancer; Urine; Iodine; Perchlorate; Thiocyanate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507018, 21537001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1600500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The incidence of thyroid cancer has recently increased worldwide. With the exception of radiation exposure, the effects of potential risk factors on thyroid cancer incidence remain controversial. Objectives: The association between exposure to iodine, perchlorate, and thiocyanate and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) incidence was evaluated and risk factors were predicted. Methods: A pair-matching case-control study was performed including 116 age-and sex-matched PTC cases and 116 non-PTC controls. Iodine, perchlorate, and thiocyanate concentrations in urine specimens were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The association between iodine, perchlorate, and thiocyanate urinary concentrations and PTC was evaluated using univariable conditional regression logistic analysis followed by multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses with backward stepwise selection to predict risk factors for PTC. Results: After adjusting for confounders and creatinine standardization, urinary concentrations of iodine [odds ratio (OR) = 11.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.97-30.52] and perchlorate (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.03-5.03) were associated with the risk of PTC, whereas urinary thiocyanate concentration showed a negative association (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.09-0.65). Conclusions: Increased exposure to iodine and perchlorate may affect PTC development, whereas high thiocyanate exposure may have a beneficial effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据