4.8 Article

Soil-plant-animal transfer models to improve soil protection guidelines: A case study from Portugal

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 27-37

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.09.005

关键词

Potentially toxic elements; Plant uptake; Food chain; Human exposure; Soil threshold concentrations

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/71072/2010]
  2. FEDER
  3. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-014149 (FCT PTDC/AGR-PRO/114956/2009)]
  4. Alterra - Wageningen UR (The Netherlands)
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/71072/2010, PTDC/AGR-PRO/114956/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food chain models are essential tools to assess risks of soil contamination in view of product quality including fodder crops and animal products. Here we link soil to plant transfer (SPT) models for potentially toxic elements (PTEs) including As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Sb, U and Zn with models describing accumulation in animal organs. Current EU standards for food products and acceptable daily intake levels (ADI) for humans were used as critical limits. The combined model is used to assess the impact of soil contamination on animal health, product quality and human health using data from 100 arable fields. Results indicate that 42 existing arable fields near industrial and mining sites are unsuitable for animal grazing in view of food safety due to elevated intake of Cd, Cu, Hg and Pb by cows and sheep. At 10 sites daily intake levels of As by cows exceeded threshold concentrations regarding the quality of animal products. The food chain model also was used inversely to derive soil threshold concentrations in view of EU fodder standards. Calculated threshold levels in soil for As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg and Zn appear to be in line with those proposed or used in other EU countries. As such the approach applied here can form a conceptual basis for a more harmonized risk assessment strategy regarding the protection of animal and human health. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据