4.8 Article

The occurrence of perfluorinated alkyl compounds in human milk from different regions of China

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 433-438

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.03.004

关键词

Perfluorinated compounds; Human milk; Breastfeeding infant; Dietary intake

资金

  1. National Nature Science of Foundation of China [20607021, 20837003]
  2. National Support Program for Science and Technology [2007BAC27B02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), especially perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA), are known to occur throughout the environment and in the human population (Houde et al., 2006). The occurrence of PFCs in human umbilical cord blood and human milk, coupled with the potential developmental toxicity of PFCs, suggests the need for determining the exposure sources and magnitudes of PFCs in infants. In this study, 10 PFCs were measured in 24 pooled samples consisting of 1237 individual human milk samples. The samples were collected from 12 provinces of China in 2007. PFOS and PFOA were the predominant PFCs found in all the samples tested. The geometric mean (GM) and median of the concentrations were 46 pg/mL and 49 pg/mL for PFOS, 46 pg/mL and 34.5 pg/mL for PFOA respectively. A large variation in geographical distribution was observed for PFCs in human milk. High concentrations of PFOA (814 pg/ml for the rural samples and 616 pg/ml for the urban samples) were found in human milk from Shanghai. Estimated dietary intakes (EDI) were established and the median, GM and the highest EDI of the total PFCs were 17.2 ng/kg/d, 17.8 ng/kg/d and 129.1 ng/kg/d respectively. The EDI for PFOA (88.4 ng/kg/d) for Shanghai was close to the tolerable daily intake (100 ng/kg/d) proposed by the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment and the Drinking Water Commission. The results suggest both mothers and infants have a high exposure to PFCs in the Shanghai region. The potential health impact of postnatal exposure through breastfeeding to infants should therefore be comprehensively evaluated. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据