4.8 Article

Road-traffic noise and factors influencing noise annoyance in an urban population

期刊

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 552-556

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2008.10.001

关键词

Road-traffic noise; Annoyance; Nighttime noise level; Noise sensitivity

资金

  1. Ministry of Science of Serbia [145013]
  2. Centre of Psychiatry, Berts & London School of Medicine, London, UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Noise annoyance is influenced by sound-related factors: type of noise, noise level and frequency, and person-related factors-physiological, psychological, and social factors. Prior to implementation of the Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council in Serbia, there was a need for the first comprehensive study on noise annoyance in Serbian urban population. The aim of this study was to determine principal factors for high noise annoyance in an adult urban population and to assess their predictive value. A cross-sectional study was performed on 3097 adult residents of a downtown municipality in Belgrade (1217 men and 1880 women), aged 18-96 years. Equivalent noise levels [Leq (dBA)] were measured during day. evening and night in all streets of the municipality. Noise annoyance was estimated using self-reported annoyance scale. Noise annoyance showed strong correlation with noise levels, personal characteristics and some housing conditions. Dose-response relationship was found between the percentage of highly annoyed residents and Lden. Logistic regression model identified increased risk for a high level of noise annoyance with regard to: orientation of living room/bedroom toward the street (Odds Ratio=2.60; 95% Confidence Interval =2.04-3.31), duration of stay at apartment during the day [OR= 1.04,95%CI = 1.02-1.06 (per hour)], noise sensitivity [OR= 1.04,95%CI = 1.03-1.04 (per scale unit)], and nighttime road-traffic noise level [OR = 1.03,95%CI = 1.02-1.04 (per decibel)]. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据