4.3 Article

Host-associated genetic differentiation in pecan leaf phylloxera

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 143, 期 2, 页码 127-137

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01250.x

关键词

Phylloxera notabilis; host discrimination; host race; amplified fragment length polymorphisms; Hemiptera; Phylloxeridae; endophagy; parthenogenesis; gall inducer; water hickory; Carya illinoinensis; Juglandaceae

资金

  1. Texas AM [09185]
  2. Department of Entomology at Texas AM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host-associated differentiation (HAD) is the formation of genetically distinct host-associated populations. One of the genotypic signatures of HAD is that populations exhibit stronger differentiation by host-plant species than by geographic isolation. HAD, as a mechanism promoting ecological speciation, has been invoked to explain phytophagous insect diversity. Two traits proposed to promote HAD are endophagy and parthenogenesis. Using amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), we tested for the presence of HAD in pecan leaf phylloxera, Phylloxera notabilis Pergande (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae), an endophagous, gall inducing, and cyclically parthenogenetic insect on sympatric pecan and water hickory at a geographic mesoscale. This species shows strong HAD. Whereas the effect of collecting site was significant, accounting for 7.3% of molecular variation, host-plant species identity accounted for 63.5%. In addition, a choice test indicated that pecan leaf phylloxera originating from water hickory showed weak but significant preference for leaflets of the natal host, whereas pecan leaf phylloxera originating from pecan did not. This is the first such study of a species of arboreal Phylloxeridae, a poorly known insect group. This is also the first endophage and the second parthenogen shared by these two hickory species to show evidence of HAD. This hickory system could be a good parthenogen-rich counterpoint to the goldenrod system in the study of HAD in insect communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据