4.3 Article

The influence of temperature and precipitation on spring dispersal of Frankliniella fusca changes as the season progresses

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 134, 期 3, 页码 260-271

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00959.x

关键词

population dynamics; tomato spotted wilt virus; Thysanoptera; Thripidae; landscape scale; degree days; bootstrap; jackknife

资金

  1. E.G. Moss and Phillip Morris Foundations
  2. North Carolina Tobacco Research Commission
  3. USDA Southern Regional IPM Program [2005-34103-15644]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Effects of temperature and precipitation on spring dispersal patterns of Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) caught on yellow sticky traps were estimated in central and eastern North Carolina and eastern Virginia, USA, from 1997 to 2001, and in 2004 and 2007. Data were collected from 44 sites within 14 locations over 7 years, resulting in 30 location-year data combinations. The following independent variables were examined to determine their relationship to the number of F. fusca caught on sticky traps during specified time intervals: cumulative degree days (base 10.5 degrees C) from 1 November to the start of each trapping interval (DD), number of days with temperatures favorable for flight during each trapping interval (DTFF), and an index of rainfall during specific intervals prior to and during the trapping interval (RI). Regression models that contained various combinations of these variables explained 62, 79, 74, and 68% of the variation in the number of dispersing F. fusca captured during 1-15 April, 16-30 April, 1-15 May, and 16-31 May, respectively. The results provide strong evidence that the suppressive effects of precipitation on growth of local populations developing during late winter and early spring are subsequently manifest at the landscape scale as reductions in the populations of dispersing adults that may persist for as long as 5-6 weeks after the precipitation occurs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据