4.7 Article

Venom Proteomics of Indonesian King Cobra, Ophiophagus hannah: Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 2539-2556

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00305

关键词

Snake venomics; Elapidae; king cobra; Ophiophagus hannah; top-down proteomics; top-down venomics

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Cluster of Excellence Unifying Concepts in Catalysis (UniCat)
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Madrid [BFU2010-17373]
  3. former Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Madrid [BFU2013-42833-P]
  4. CYTED project [BIOTOX P211RT0412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the first application of top-down mass spectrometry in snake venomics. De novo sequence tags generated by, and ProSight Lite supported analysis of, combined collisional based dissotiations (CID and HCD) recorded in a hybrid LTQ Orbitrap instrument in data-dependent mode identified a number of proteins from different toxin families, namely, 11 three-finger toxins (7-7.9 kDa), a Kunitz-type inhibitor (6.3 kDa), ohanin (11.9 kDa), a novel phospholipase A(2) molecule (13.8 kDa), and the cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRISP) ophanin (25 kDa) from Indonesian king cobra venom. Complementary bottom-up MS/MS analyses contributed to the completion of a locus-resolved venom phenotypic map for Ophiophagus hannah, the world's longest venomous snake and a species of medical concern across its wide distribution range in forests from India to Southeast Asia. Its venom composition, comprising 32-35 proteins/peptides from 10 protein families, is dominated by alpha-neurotoxins and convincingly explains the main neurotoxic effects of human envenoming caused by king cobra bite. The integration of efficient chromatographic separation of the venom's components and locus-resolved toxin identification through top-down and bottom-up MS/MS-based species-specific database searching and de novo sequencing holds promise that the future will be bright for the field of venom research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据