4.7 Article

Buckle propagation of sandwich pipes under external pressure

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 339-354

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.033

关键词

Sandwich pipe; Collapse; Buckle propagation; Inter-layer adhesion; External pressure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779223, 51479176, 51009122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sandwich pipe (SP), consisting of two comparatively thin-walled metal tubes and a thick polymer or cement based core, is believed to be a feasible conception to transport hydrocarbons in deep sea. In this paper, the buckle propagation experiments were carried out on small-scale SP test specimens composed of two aluminium tubes and the polypropylene (PP) core. In association with experimental efforts, dedicated finite element models of SP test specimens under external pressure were established to reproduce the local collapse and consequent buckle propagating scenarios using the software ABAQUS, and good agreements were observed between the experimental and numerical results. Then, influencing mechanisms of inter-layer adhesion behaviour on the stress state, cross-section deformation and buckle propagation pressure of SPs were systematically studied, and broad parameter correlation analyses were performed to explore geometric and material properties of two steel tubes and polymer core on the buckle propagation pressure of SPs. The results show that good interface bonding conditions can markedly enhance the buckle propagation pressure of SPs and improve the energy dissipation and the deformation capacity of the structures. The core layer thickness and the ratio of the wall thickness between inner and outer tubes have extremely noticeable effect on the buckle propagation pressure of SPs. Additionally, based upon extensive numerical results, an empirical design expression was developed to conservatively estimate the buckle propagation pressure of SP systems for the no inter-layer adhesion case.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据