4.7 Article

Comprehensive Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry Reveals Parallel Orientation and Flexible Conformations of Plant HOP2-MND1

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 5048-5062

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00903

关键词

HOP2-MND1; XL-MS; SEC; cross-linking; comparative modeling; DSS; EDC; BS(2)G

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund [SFB F3402, P2465-B24, TRIP 308-N15, I1468-B16]
  2. European Commission via the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)
  3. project PRIME-XS [262067]
  4. IMP
  5. IMBA
  6. Rijk Zwaan
  7. MEIOsys project [222883-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HOP2-MND1 heterodimer is essential for meiotic homologous recombination in plants and other eukaryotes and promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. We investigated the conformational flexibility of HOP2-MND1, important for understanding the mechanistic details of the heterodimer, with chemical cross-linking in combination with mass spectrometry (XL MS). The final XL MS workflow encompassed the use of complementary cross-linkers, quenching, digestion, size exclusion enrichment, and HCD-based LC-MS/MS detection prior to data evaluation. We applied two different homobifunctional amine-reactive cross-linkers (DSS and BS(2)G) and one zero-length heterobifunctional cross-linker (EDC). Cross-linked peptides of four biological replicates were analyzed prior to 3D structure prediction by protein threading and protein protein docking for cross-link-guided molecular modeling. Miniaturization of the size-exclusion enrichment step reduced the required starting material, led to a high amount of cross-linked peptides, and allowed the analysis of replicates. The major interaction site of HOP2-MND1 was identified in the central coiled-coil domains, and an open colinear parallel arrangement of HOP2 and MND1 within the complex was predicted. Moreover, flexibility of the C-terminal capping helices of both complex partners was observed, suggesting the coexistence of a closed complex conformation in solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据