4.7 Article

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Human Liver Tissue and Isolated Hepatocytes with a Focus on Proteins Determining Drug Exposure

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 3305-3314

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00334

关键词

quantitative proteomics; total protein approach; oxidative stress; human hepatocytes; membrane proteome; ADME proteins; CYP enzymes; UGT enzymes; drug transporters; in vitro-in vivo extrapolation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [2822]
  2. Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation, O.E.
  3. O.E. and Edla Johansson's Scientific Foundation
  4. Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Freshly isolated human hepatocytes are considered the gold standard for in vitro studies of liver functions, including drug transport, metabolism, and toxicity. For accurate predictions of the in vivo outcome, the isolated hepatocytes should reflect the phenotype of their in vivo counterpart, i.e., hepatocytes in human liver tissue. Here, we quantified and compared the membrane proteomes of freshly isolated hepatocytes and human liver tissue using a label-free shotgun proteomics approach. A total of 5144 unique proteins were identified, spanning over 6 orders of magnitude in abundance. There was a good global correlation in protein abundance. However, the expression of many plasma membrane proteins was lower in the isolated hepatocytes than in the liver tissue. This included transport proteins that determine hepatocyte exposure to many drugs and endogenous compounds. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins confirmed that hepatocytes are exposed to oxidative stress during isolation and suggested that plasma membrane proteins were degraded via the protein ubiquitination pathway. Finally, using pitavastatin as an example, we show how protein quantifications can improve in vitro predictions of in vivo liver clearance. We tentatively conclude that our data set will be a useful resource for improved hepatocyte predictions of the in vivo outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据