4.7 Article

Experimental and analytical studies on the stability of structural steel tube and coupler scaffolds without X-bracing

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 1003-1015

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.027

关键词

Structural steel tube and coupler scaffold; Stability; Experimental research; Nonlinear Finite element analysis

资金

  1. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [08JCZDJC19600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic experimental and analytical studies are presented in this paper on the stability of structural steel tubes and coupler scaffolds without X-bracing (hereinafter referred to as STCS). Twelve full-scale STCS specimens with various geometric properties were constructed and tested statically in the lab, in order to obtain the strength as well as the failure modes of typical STCS's. Advanced nonlinear finite element analysis was conducted on the specimen models using the ANSYS program, in order to obtain the strength and failure modes of the STCS's and to compare with experimental results. Parametric studies were carried out based on the FEA results, in order to investigate the influence of various geometric properties on the stability behavior of STCS's. Based on both the experimental and the analytical results, it can be concluded that the typical failure mode of STCS's is global buckling about the weak axis The strength was found to be sensitive to the rotational stiffness of the coupler, the storey height, and the U-head height, but insensitive to the post spacing and the sweeping staff height. Furthermore, a simplified model and formula were established for the strength of STCS's under uniform load and presented in the paper, which were verified by the experimental and analytical results and which turned out to be accurate enough in predicting the strength In the end, recommendations are proposed for the design of STCS's based on the research results, which provides a very useful reference for the industry as well as academia for design and future research. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据