4.7 Article

Human Basal Tear Peptidome Characterization by CID, HCD, and ETD Followed by in Silico and in Vitro Analyses for Antimicrobial Peptide Identification

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 2649-2658

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00179

关键词

tear; CID; HCD; ETD; antimicrobial peptides (AMP); peptidome; natural peptides; degradome; top-down proteomics

资金

  1. ProteoRed-ISCIII
  2. Basque Government-ETORTEK program
  3. Bizkaia County

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endogenous peptides are valuable targets in the analysis of biological processes. The tear film contains proteins and peptides released by the tear duct mucosal cells, including antimicrobial peptides involved in the protection against exogenous pathogens; however, the peptide content of the tear liquid remains poorly characterized. We analyzed naturally occurring peptides isolated from human basal tears. Mass spectrometry analysis of endogenous peptides presents a number of drawbacks, including size heterogeneity and nonpredictable fragmentation patterns, among others. Therefore, CID, ETD, and HCD methods were used for the characterization of the tear peptide content. The contribution of DMSO as an additive of the chromatographic solvents was also evaluated. We identified 157, 131, and 122 peptides using CID-, ETD-, and HCD-based methods, respectively. Altogether, 234 different peptides were identified, leading to the generation of the biggest data set of endogenous tear peptides to date. The antimicrobial activity prediction analysis performed in silico revealed different putative antimicrobial peptides. Two of the extracellular glycoprotein lacritin peptides were de novo synthesized, and their antimicrobial activity was confirmed in vitro. Our findings demonstrate the benefits of using different fragmentation methods for the analysis of endogenous peptides and provide a useful approach for the discovery of peptides with antimicrobial activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据