4.3 Article

The impact of pH control on the volumetric productivity of mixed culture PHA production from fermented molasses

期刊

ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 143-152

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201200220

关键词

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Mixed microbial cultures (MMC); pH control; Phosphorus; Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) [PTDC/EBB-EBI/103147/2008, PTDC/AGR-ALI/122741/2010, PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011]
  2. EU through the project Ecoefficient Biodegradable Composite Advanced Packaging (EcoBioCAP) [0265669]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AGR-ALI/122741/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production via mixed microbial cultures (MMCs) can potentially decrease process operational costs as compared to conventional pure culture techniques. However, the volumetric productivity of PHA by MMCs must be augmented to increase its cost competitiveness. For this purpose, a three-stage bioreactor system was operated in this study, with (i) anaerobic fermentation of molasses, (ii) culture selection, and (iii) PHA accumulation and harvesting stages. In stage2, bioreactor operation with pH control at 8 led to twice the biomass concentration (up to 8 g VSS L-1, where VSS is the volatile suspended solids) as compared to operation without pH control (maximum pH 9). No loss in the specific PHA storage efficiency was observed (PHA content up to 57.5% and PHA storage rate up to 0.27 Cmol PHA Cmol X-1 h(-1), where X is the active biomass), thereby resulting in twice the volumetric PHA production rate. The limited biomass growth at the higher pH level was not due to nutrient limitation, but likely to a shift in the microbial community. It is hypothesized that the increased enrichment of Azoarcus at pH 8 led to higher PHA productivity. pH control in the culture selection stage can lead to enhanced PHA production from MMCs, improving the viability of the process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据