4.3 Article

Characteristics of strawberry plants propagated by in vitro bioreactor culture and ex vitro propagation method

期刊

ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 239-246

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200800095

关键词

Antioxidant activity; Bioreactor micropropagation; ISSR marker; Morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reproducible protocol for regeneration of complete plantlets from 'Bounty' strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.), using a combination of gelled medium and bioreactor system, has been standardized. Sepals, leaf discs, and petiole halves produced multiple buds and shoots when cultured on semi solid-gelled medium containing 4 mu M thidiazuron (TDZ) for 4 wk followed by transferring in liquid medium containing 2 mu M TDZ in a bioreactor system and cultured for another 4 wk. TDZ induced shoot proliferation at 0.1 mu M in the bioreactor system but inhibited shoot elongation. TDZ-induced shoots were elongated and rooted in vitro on gelled medium containing 2 mu M zeatin. Such bioreactor-derived tissue culture (BC) plantlets obtained from sepal explants were grown ex vitro and compared with those propagated by tissue culture on gelled medium (GC) and by conventional runner cuttings (RC), for growth, morphology, anthocyanin content, and antioxidant activity after three growth seasons. The BC and GC plants produced more crowns, runners, leaves, and berries than the RC plants although berry weight per plant did not differ significantly. BC and GC plants produced berries with more anthocyanin contents and antioxidant activities than those produced by the RC plants. However, intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) marker assay produced a homogenous amplification profile in the tissue culture and donor control plants confirming the clonal fidelity of micropropagated plants. In vitro culture on TDZ and zeatin-containing nutrient media apparently induced the juvenile branching characteristics that favored enhanced vegetative growth with more crown, runners, leaf, and berry production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据