4.7 Article

Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake

期刊

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
卷 180, 期 -, 页码 85-98

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.017

关键词

Wenchuan earthquake; Seismic damage mechanism; Relative displacement; Mountain tunnel

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41102220, 51178398]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [SWJTUCX014]
  3. Development Plan for Ministry of Education Innovation team [IRT0955]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake (Mw = 8.3), many mountain highway tunnels in the affected area were severely damaged. In order to improve the current knowledge about the seismic performance of mountain tunnels under strong earthquakes, a forensic investigation was conducted on 52 tunnels after the earthquake. Based on the seismic damage data, the damage level of the inspected tunnels was classified using a new damage evaluation criterion. Subsequently, typical seismic damage characteristics and mechanisms of mountain tunnels were analyzed based on three different damage patterns: damage to shallow tunnel, damage to deep-buried tunnel structure and damage to pavement. Finally, based on the relative displacement (RD) method, a three-dimensional numerical model was developed to investigate the deformation characteristics of the portal structure under a strong earthquake. The numerical results showed that the tunnel lining cross section exhibited an alternate tension-compression deformation at the diagonal directions, and the relative displacement value of the upper-structure (above the sidewall) was generally more than that of the lower-structure (under the sidewall). Three stress states of the lining were deduced from the numerical model, which provided a good interpretation for the seismic tunnel damages observed after the Wenchuan earthquake. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据