4.7 Article

Systematic assessment of directional mesh bias with periodic boundary conditions: Applied to the crack band model

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 186-208

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.06.005

关键词

Directional mesh bias; Concrete; Fracture; Finite elements; Crack band model

资金

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. applied science division of NWO
  3. Technology Program of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulation of strain localization can suffer from mesh orientation dependency when the mesh lines are not aligned with the localization band direction. In this paper the main objective is to present a dedicated numerical test that enables to assess the directional mesh bias of constitutive models in a systematic way. The test makes use of periodic boundary conditions, by which strain localization can be analyzed for different mesh alignments with preservation of mesh uniformity and with exclusion of boundary disturbances. Furthermore, the test can be used for calibration of length scale parameters, such as a crack bandwidth or a width of a nonlocal averaging zone, that aim to guarantee mesh objectivity. Above numerical test is systematically applied to the classical and still widely used crack band model. Simultaneously, different finite element characteristics are varied in a clean-cut way. From the results a significant directional mesh bias is identified quantitatively, depending on element shape, interpolation function and numerical integration scheme. The results have inspired to come up with an enhanced and more general crack bandwidth estimator. Validation of this new formulation on two demanding experimental fracture tests shows an improvement of the crack band model regarding its mesh objectivity. Based on the application with the crack band model, the authors consider the proposed numerical test as an attractive tool for assessing more advanced fracture models. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据