4.4 Article

Hybrid-Trefftz finite element method for heat conduction in nonlinear functionally graded materials

期刊

ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS
卷 28, 期 5-6, 页码 578-599

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/02644401111141028

关键词

Finite element analysis; Heat conduction; Materials management

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2010CB832702]
  2. State Key Lab of Structural Analysis of Industrial Equipment [GZ0902]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010B15214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a hybrid-Trefftz (HT) finite element model (FEM) for simulating heat conduction in nonlinear functionally graded materials (FGMs) which can effectively handle continuously varying properties within an element. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed model, a T-complete set of homogeneous solutions is first derived and used to represent the intra-element temperature fields. As a result, the graded properties of the FGMs are naturally reflected by using the newly developed Trefftz functions (T-complete functions in some literature) to model the intra-element fields. The derivation of the Trefftz functions is carried out by means of the well-known Kirchhoff transformation in conjunction with various variable transformations. Findings - The study shows that, in contrast to the conventional FEM, the HT-FEM is an accurate numerical scheme for FGMs in terms of the number of unknowns and is insensitive to mesh distortion. The method also performs very well in terms of numerical accuracy and can converge to the analytical solution when the number of elements is increased. Originality/value - The value of this paper is twofold: a T-complete set of homogeneous solutions for nonlinear FMGs has been derived and used to represent the intra-element temperature; and the corresponding variational functional and the associated algorithm has been constructed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据