4.5 Article

When Does Customer Orientation Hinder (Help) Radical Product Innovation? The Role of Organizational Rewards

期刊

JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 435-454

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12301

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prior marketing literature offers a compelling theoretical rationale in support of two contradictory propositions, namely, that customer orientation is negatively related to (i.e., hinders) radical product innovation and that customer orientation is positively related to (i.e., helps) radical product innovation. In this research, the contextual conditions that determine the validity of these contradictory propositions are identified. Drawing from the literature on organizational rewards, two types of organizational rewardsoutcome based and strategy basedare identified as being the key contextual conditions. It is hypothesized that when outcome-based rewards are in effect, customer orientation is negatively related to radical positive innovation and, that when strategy-based rewards are in effect, customer orientation is positively related to radical product innovation. Results from a survey of 156 manufacturing firms, and from a survey of 97 of their customers, provide support for these hypotheses. While prior research has attempted to explain the contradictory nature of the relationship between customer orientation and radical product innovation using typology-based and mediator-based approaches, the contextual condition-based approach has not been well developed. This gap is addressed by the present research. From a practitioner perspective, the research is important because it identifies a concrete mechanism that new product development managers can deploy, in tandem with customer orientation, if they intend to generate radical product innovations. Given the potential gains that flow from radical product innovation, the research findings are expected to be of considerable interest to managers of new product development projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据