4.8 Article

NiCo2O4 nanosheets in-situ grown on three dimensional porous Ni film current collectors as integrated electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 286, 期 -, 页码 371-379

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.180

关键词

NiCo2O4 nanosheets; Three dimensional porous nickel film; Binder free; Integrated electrode; Electrochemical capacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21203236]
  2. Guangdong and Shenzhen Innovative Research Team Program [2011D052, KYPT20121228160843692]
  3. Shenzhen Electronic Packaging Materials Engineering Laboratory [2012-372]
  4. Shenzhen High Density Electronic Packaging and Device Assembly Key Laboratory [ZDSYS20140509174237196]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three dimensional interconnected hierarchical porous Ni films are easily fabricated as effective current collectors through hydrogen bubble template electrochemical deposition. The binder-free integrated electrodes of spinel NiCo2O4 nanosheets directly coated the three dimensional porous Ni films are facilely obtained through successively electrochemical co-deposition of Ni/Co alloy layer then followed by subsequent annealing at 350 degrees C in air. Compared with NiCo2O4 nanosheets on smooth Ni foil or porous NiO/Ni film electrodes, the porous NiCo2O4/Ni integrated film electrodes for supercapacitors demonstrate remarkably higher area specific capacitance. The porous NiCo2O4/Ni film electrodes also exhibit excellent rate capability and cycling stability. The super electrochemical capacitive performances are attributed to the unique integrated architecture of NiCo2O4 nanosheets in-situ grown on three dimensional continuous hierarchical porous Ni collector collectors, which could provide large electrode-electrolyte interface area, high active sites, low contact resistance between current collector and active materials, fast electron conduction and ion/electrolyte diffusion. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据