4.8 Article

Electrochemical properties of iron oxides/carbon nanotubes as anode material for lithium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 1091-1099

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.181

关键词

Gel-like film; Hollow nanotubes; Iron oxides; Electrochemical properties; Lithium ion batteries

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [201303934003]
  2. 863 program [2013AA050902]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21273019]
  4. Guangdong Industry-Academy-Research Alliance [2013C2FC0015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A composited anode material with combined Fe3O4/FeO nanotube and carbon shell is synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method with subsequent CVD heat treatment. The as-prepared Fe3O4/FeO/C composite shows excellent cycle stability and rate capability as lithium ion battery anode. We study the effect of FeO on the electrochemical performances of the Fe3O4/FeO/C electrode. A capacity climbing phenomenon can be observed for the Fe3O4/FeO/C electrodes, which tends to be more evident with increasing FeO content. The extra capacity is correlated with the reversible formation of polymeric gel-like film on the particle surface of active materials, which is electrochemical active towards Li ions. The FeO component presents a certain extent of catalytic role in assisting the formation of the gel-like film. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analytical technique are combined to further confirm the reversible growth of the SEI gel-like film. High temperature promotes the formation of gel-like film, while the resistance from the film decreases remarkably with temperature due to the enhanced lithium ion conductivity. The film contributes little to the whole EIS resistance of Fe3O4/FeO nanotube/carbon electrode. Tentative explanations based on the current experiments and existing literature are made to explain such unusual finding. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据