4.7 Article

Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 822-828

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.107

关键词

Fukushima; Public opinion; Nuclear energy

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Korean Government [NRF-2011-013-B00051, NRF-2012-S1A3A-2033860]
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20093021020020]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20093021020020] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fukushima nuclear disaster has significantly changed public attitudes toward nuclear energy. It is important to understand how this change has occurred in different countries before the global community revises existing nuclear policies. This study examines the effect of the Fukushima disaster on public acceptance of nuclear energy in 42 countries. We find that the operational experience of nuclear power generation which has significantly affected positive public opinion about nuclear energy became considerably negative after the disaster, suggesting fundamental changes in public acceptance regardless of the level of acceptance before the disaster. In addition, contrary to our expectation, the proportion of nuclear power generation is positively and significantly related to public acceptance of nuclear energy after the Fukushima accident and government pressure on media content led to a greater decrease in the level of public acceptance after the accident. Nuclear energy policymakers should consider the varied factors affecting public acceptance of nuclear energy in each country depending on its historical, environmental, and geographical circumstances before they revise nuclear policy in response to the Fukushima accident. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据