4.7 Article

Decomposing the change of CO2 emissions: A joint production theoretical approach

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 329-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.034

关键词

Decomposition analysis; CO2 emissions; Data envelopment analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71173075]
  2. Beijing Planning Project of Philosophy and Social Science [11JGA010]
  3. Ministry of Education Doctoral Foundation of China [20110036120013]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  5. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central Universities of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an alternative decomposition method to explore the driving forces of change in carbon emissions by using distance functions estimated by data envelopment analysis. The proposed approach can isolate the effects of changes in GDP composition and energy supply composition on the change of carbon emissions. In addition, it is capable of identifying the effects of changes in different input ratios, which may be very important if there are substitution effects among different inputs. Moreover, the proposed model can measure the effects of changes in good and bad output technical efficiencies. Consequently, this decomposition technique allows a change of carbon emissions to be decomposed into contributions from ten factors, which provides more insights for policy makers. We apply this model to decompose carbon emissions in 25 OECD counties and China. For the sample countries as a whole, the empirical results indicate that the economic growth is the crucial driver to carbon emissions increase, while the changes in GDP composition and capital-energy ratio are two main drivers to carbon emissions reduction. In particular, we discuss in detail the driving forces of China's carbon emissions change in order to propose some valuable policy implications for China from an international perspective. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据