4.8 Article

Enhance the performance of co-sensitized solar cell by a series efficient pyridine-anchor co-adsorbents of N,N′-bis((pyridin-2-yl) methylene)-p-phenylenediimine and a ruthenium dye of N719

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 203-212

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.063

关键词

Dye sensitized solar cells; Co-sensitized; Pyridine-anchor co-adsorbents; Enhance performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171044, 21371040]
  2. National key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB632900]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. IBRSEM. A. 201409]
  4. Program for Innovation Research of Science in Harbin Institute of Technology (PIRS of HIT) [A201418, A201416, B201414]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A pyridine-anchor co-adsorbent N,N'-bis((pyridin-2-yl)methylene)-p-phenyl- lenediimine (named L1) and its derivatives N,N'-bis((6-methoxylpyridin-2-yl)methylene)- p-phenylenediimine (named L2) and N,N'-bis((pyridin-2-y1) (methyl)methylene)-p-phenyl- enediimine (named 13) are synthesized and employed in combination with a ruthenium complex N719 in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). The prepared co-adsorbent can overcome the deficiency of N719 absorption in the low wavelength region of visible spectrum, offset competitive visible light absorption of I-3(-), suppress the charge recombination and prolong the electron lifetime. The introduction of methyl or methoxyl substituent also has some effect on the performance of DSSCs. A short circuit current density of 14.60 mA cm(-2), an open circuit voltage of 0.75 V and a fill factor of 0.63 corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 6.92% under AM 1.5G solar irradiation are achieved when L2 is used as co-adsorbent, which is 30% higher than that for DSSCs only sensitized by N719 (5.31%) under the same condition. Mechanistic investigations are carried out by various spectral and electrochemical characterizations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据