4.8 Article

Dual cross-linked organic-inorganic hybrid polymer electrolyte membranes based on quaternized poly(ether ether ketone) and (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 815-822

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.078

关键词

Quatemized poly(ether ether ketone); High temperature proton exchange membrane; Fuel cell; Phosphoric acid

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21104022, 21374034]
  2. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation for Young Teachers in the Higher Education Institutions of China [142010]
  3. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quaternized poly(ether ether ketone)s (QPEEKs) are synthesized to absorb phosphoric acid (PA) and used as high temperature proton exchange membranes (HTPEMs). In order to improve their oxidative and mechanical stability without sacrificing proton conductivities, a series of dual cross-linked organicinorganic hybrid membranes are prepared using (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) as a crosslinker. The amine of APTES reacts with two benzyl bromide groups to build the primary cross-linking network. The Si-O-Si network generated by the hydrolysis of triethoxysilane in APTES is the secondary cross-linking network. The dual cross-linking hybrid networks improve the mechanical and oxidative stability of PA doped membranes. They can endure up to 153 h in 3 wt.% H2O2, 4 ppm Fe2+ Fenton solution at 80 degrees C. During the hydrolysis of triethoxysilane, the release of small molecules (H2O and C2H5OH) forms many pores in surfaces and interior of membranes. These pores and the resulted Si-OH groups corporately enhance the PA absorbing ability and proton conductivity. The highest proton conductivity is 61.7 mS cm(-1) for PA-QPEEK-10%APTES at 200 degrees C under anhydrous condition. These membranes show great potential to be used in HTPEM fuel cell. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据