4.7 Article

The prospects for coal-fired power plants with carbon capture and storage: A UK perspective

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 476-489

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.030

关键词

Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Electricity generation; Coal-fired power plants; Economics; Energy metrics; Environmental impacts

资金

  1. E.On UK
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  3. EPSRC [EP/F022832/1]
  4. UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC)
  5. UK Research Councils
  6. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  7. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  8. UKERC
  9. Hampshire County Counci
  10. Higher Education Funding Council
  11. [NE/G007748/1]
  12. EPSRC [EP/F022832/1, EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. NERC [NE/G007748/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F022832/1, EP/K005316/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G007748/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) facilities coupled to coal-fired power plants provide a climate change mitigation strategy that potentially permits the continued use of fossil fuels whilst reducing the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Potential design routes for the capture, transport and storage of CO2 from United Kingdom (UK) power plants are examined. Energy and carbon analyses were performed on coal-fired power stations with and without CCS. Both currently available and novel CCS technologies are evaluated. Due to lower operating efficiencies, the CCS plants showed a longer energy payback period and a lower energy gain ratio than conventional plant. Cost estimates are reported in the context of recent UK industry-led attempts to determine opportunities for cost reductions across the whole CCS chain, alongside international endeavours to devise common CCS cost estimation methods. These cost figures should be viewed as 'indicative' or suggestive. They are nevertheless helpful to various CCS stakeholder groups [such as those in industry, policy makers (civil servants and the staff of various government agencies), and civil society and environmental 'non-governmental organisations' (NGOs)] in order to enable them to assess the role of this technology in national energy strategies and its impact on local communities. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据