4.7 Article

Performance analysis of a minichannel-based solar collector using different nanofluids

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 129-138

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.021

关键词

Minichannel solar collector; Entropy generation; Nanofluids; Efficiency

资金

  1. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) through Science and Technology Unit at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) [13-ENE1573-04]
  2. Thailand Research Fund
  3. National Science and Technology Development Agency
  4. National Research University Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an analytical analysis has been performed to evaluate the performance of a minichannel-based solar collector using four different nanofluids including Cu/water, Al2O3/water, TiO2/water, and SiO2/water. The analysis of first and second laws is conducted for turbulent flow by considering the constant mass flow rate of nanofluid. The results are presented for volume fractions up to 4% and nanopartide size of 25 nm where the inner diameter of the risers of flat plate collector is assumed to be 2 mm. Analysis of the first law of thermodynamics reveals that Al2O3/water nanofluids show the highest heat transfer coefficient in the tubes while the lowest value belongs to SiO2/water nanofluids. The highest outlet temperature is provided by Cu/water nanofluids, and after that TiOdwater, Al2O3/water, and SiO2/water nanofluids are in ranks of second to fourth. The results of second law analysis elucidate that Cu/water nanofluid produces the lowest entropy generation among the nanofluids. It is found that although the effective thermal conductivity of TiO2/water nanofluids is less than Al2O3/water nanofluids, but the entropy generation of TiO2/water is lower than Al2O3/water. Finally, some recommendations are given for future studies on the applications of nanofluids in solar collectors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据