4.8 Article

Unconventional irreversible structural changes in a high-voltage Li-Mn-rich oxide for lithium-ion battery cathodes

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 423-428

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.087

关键词

Lithium rich; Structural transformation; Spinel; High-energy-density lithium-ion batteries; Magnetic frustration

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  2. DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
  3. Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO)
  4. Applied Battery Research (ABR) Program
  5. DOE Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  6. VTO's ABR Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Making all-electric vehicles (EVs) commonplace in transportation applications will require affordable high-power and high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The quest for suitable cathode materials to meet this end has currently plateaued with the discovery of high-voltage (>= 4.7 V vs. Li+), high capacity (similar to 250 mAh/g) lithium manganese-rich (LMR) layered composite oxides. Despite the promise of LMR oxides in high-energy-density LIBs, an irreversible structural change has been identified in this work that is governed by the formation of a 'permanent' spin-glass type magnetically frustrated phase indicating a dominant AB(2)O(4) (A = Li, B = Mn) type spinel after a short-term lithium deintercalation (charging) and intercalation (discharging) process. Furthermore, reduction of transition metal (Mn) ions from the 4+ state (pristine LMR) to 3+ (cycled LMR), which alters the intercalation redox chemistry and suggests the presence of 'unfilled' lithium vacancies and/or oxygen vacancies in the lattice after cycling, has presented a major stumbling block. These situations result in both loss of capacity and fading of the voltage profile, and these combined effects significantly reduce the high energy density over even short-term cycling. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据