Exhaust energy conversion by thermoelectric generator: Two case studies

This study reports predictions of the power and fuel savings produced by thermoelectric generators (TEG) placed in the exhaust stream of a sports utility vehicle (SUV) and a stationary, compressed-natural-gas-fueled engine generator set (CNG). Results are obtained for generators using either commercially-available bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) or quantum-well (QW) thermoelectric material. The simulated tests are at constant speed in the Shy case and at constant AC power load in the CNG case. The simulations make use of the capabilities of ADVISOR 2002, the vehicle modeling system, supplemented with code to describe the thermoelectric generator system. The increase in power between the QW- and Bi2Te3 based generators was about three times for the SUV and seven times for the CNG generator under the same simulation conditions. The relative fuel savings for the Shy averaged around -0.2% using Bi2Te3 and 1.25% using QW generators. For the CNG case the fuel savings was around 0.4% using Bi2Te3 and around 3% using QW generators. The negative fuel gains in the SUV were caused by parasitic losses. The power to transport the TEG system weight was the dominant parasitic loss for the SUV but was absent in the CNG generator. The lack of space constraint and the absence of parasitic loss from the TEG system weight in the CNG case allowed an increase in the TEG system size to generate more power. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.