4.7 Article

Quantifying uncertainty in thermophysical properties of walls by means of Bayesian inversion

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 220-245

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.045

关键词

U-value; Bayesian framework; Heat transfer; Inverse problems; Building performance

资金

  1. FP7 framework of the Holistic Energy-efficient Retrofit of Buildings (HERB) project [314283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a computational framework to statistically infer thermophysical properties of any given wall from in-situmeasurements of air temperature and surface heat fluxes. The proposed framework uses these measurements, within a Bayesian calibration approach, to sequentially infer input parameters of a one-dimensional heat diffusion model that describes the thermal performance of the wall. These inputs include spatially-variable functions that characterise the thermal conductivity and the volumetric heat capacity of the wall. We encode our computational framework in an algorithm that sequentially updates our probabilistic knowledge of the thermophysical properties as new measurements become available, and thus enables an on-the-fly uncertainty quantification of these properties. In addition, the proposed algorithm enables us to investigate the effect of the discretisation of the underlying heat diffusion model on the accuracy of estimates of thermophysical properties and the corresponding predictive distributions of heat flux. By means of virtual/synthetic and real experiments we show the capabilities of the proposed approach to (i) characterise heterogenous thermophysical properties associated with, for example, unknown cavities and insulators: (ii) obtain rapid and accurate uncertainty estimates of effective thermal properties (e.g. thermal transmittance): and (iii) accurately compute an statistical description of the thermal performance of the wall which is, in turn, crucial in evaluating possible retrofit measures. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据