4.8 Article

Ultrasonication-assisted ultrafast preparation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Au/Co3O4 tubular hybrids as superior anode materials for oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 285-293

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.049

关键词

Ultrasonic approach; Multiwalled carbon nanotubes; Au nanoparticles; Co3O4 layer; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21345003]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Izujbky-2015-16]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu [145RJZA132, 143GKA013]
  4. Key Laboratory of Catalytic Engineering of Gansu Province and Resources Utilization, Gansu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient and simple operation electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are essential components of renewable energy technologies. Here, a novel, simple, and efficient routine is presented for the first time by constructing a high-efficiency anode catalyst for OER. With the aid of high intensity ultrasound, a uniformly loading, conductive multiwalled carbon nanotubes/metal/transition metal-oxide (CNTs-Au@CO3O4) tubular hybrids is synthesized. In alkaline media, the materials catalyze OER with an onset potential of 1.56 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) and overpotential only of 350 mV to achieve a stable current density of 10 mA cm(-2) for at least 25 h. The unusual catalytic activity and stability is due to the following elements. Firstly, the tubular architecture not only provides sufficient active centers for OER, but also improves rapid mass/charge transport. Secondly, Co3O4 layer protects Au nanoparticles (NPs) against detachment. In addition, we also prove that the highest electronegativity metal Au accelerate the formation of catalytic active sites of Co-IV species for OER. It is believed that this simple preparation method paves a way to fabricate a range of CNTs/metal/metal-oxide based composites as superior OER catalysts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据