4.8 Article

Mathematical modeling of synthesis gas fueled electrochemistry and transport including H2/CO co-oxidation and surface diffusion in solid oxide fuel cell

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 294, 期 -, 页码 317-332

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.070

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cell; Mathematical model; Synthesis gas; Hydrogen/carbon monoxide co-oxidation; Surface diffusion; Enhancement factor

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-BR-13-029]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fuel flexibility is a significant advantage of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC). A comprehensive macroscopic framework is proposed for synthesis gas (syngas) fueled electrochemistry and transport in SOFC anode with two main novelties, i.e. analytical H-2/CO electrochemical co-oxidation, and correction of gas species concentration at triple phase boundary considering competitive absorption and surface diffusion. Staring from analytical approximation of the decoupled charge and mass transfer, we present analytical solutions of two defined variables, i.e. hydrogen current fraction and enhancement factor. Giving explicit answer (rather than case-by-case numerical calculation) on how many percent of the current output contributed by H-2 or CO and on how great the water gas shift reaction plays role on, this approach establishes at the first time an adaptive superposition mechanism of H-2-fuel and CO-fuel electrochemistry for syngas fuel. Based on the diffusion equivalent circuit model, assuming series-connected resistances of surface diffusion and bulk diffusion, the model predicts well at high fuel utilization by keeping fixed porosity/tortuosity ratio. The model has been validated by experimental polarization behaviors in a wide range of operation on a button cell for H-2-H2O-CO-CO2-N-2 fuel systems. The framework could be helpful to narrow the gap between macro-scale and meso-scale SOFC modeling. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据