4.7 Article

Use of PCM-polymer composite dense sheet including EAFD in constructive systems

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.09.004

关键词

Phase change materials (PCM); Shape stabilized PCM; Thermal energy storage (TES); Electrical arc furnace dust (EAFD); Polymeric matrix; Acoustic properties; Thermophysical properties; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Spanish Government [ENE2011-28269-C03-02]
  2. European Union [COST Action TU0802]
  3. Program 'PPV Universitat de Barcelona-Santander Bank'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, the overall energy consumption is increasing significantly and the energy consumption in the building sector represents over 30% of the global ones in developed countries. Thermal energy storage (TES) using phase change materials (PCM), which are materials able to store high amounts of energy as latent heat, is suggested as a possible solution to decrease the energy consumption. The authors of this paper developed materials able to encapsulate/stabilize PCM in addition to isolate an industrial residue from the steel recycling process: electrical arc furnace dust (EAFD). This waste is a hazardous dust, and when it is combined with a polymeric matrix produce dense sheet materials suitable for multilayered constructive systems. In this paper the physical, mechanical, thermal and acoustical characterization of two new materials with EAFD and PCM in a polymeric matrix for constructive system is presented. The results are compared with those obtained for one commercial dense sheet material available in the market, Texsound commercialized by TEXSA (Spain). The new dense sheet materials developed in this paper have similar acoustic properties compared to the results obtained for the commercial material and are competitive with it, even better because the new material incorporates PCM which increases the thermal inertia of final constructive system. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据