4.7 Review

Review of passive PCM latent heat thermal energy storage systems towards buildings' energy efficiency

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 82-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.042

关键词

Phase change material (PCM); Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES); Passive building applications; Energy efficiency; Dynamic simulation of energy in buildings (DSEB); Lifecycle assessment

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [SFRH/BD/51640/2011]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/51640/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to explore how and where phase change materials (PCMs) are used in passive latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems, and to present an overview of how these construction solutions are related to building's energy performance. A survey on research trends are firstly presented followed by the discussion of some physical and theoretical considerations about the building and the potential of integrating PCMs in construction elements. The different types of PCMs and main criteria that govern their selection are reviewed, as well as the main methods to measure PCMs' thermal properties, and the techniques to incorporate PCMs into building elements. The numerical modeling of heat transfer with phase-change and heat transfer enhanced techniques are discussed, followed by a review of several passive LHTES systems with PCMs. Studies on dynamic simulation of energy in buildings (DSEB) incorporating PCMs are reviewed, mainly those supported by EnergyPlus, ESP-r and TRNSYS software tools. Lifecycle assessments, both environmental and economic are discussed. This review shows that passive construction solutions with PCMs provide the potential for reducing energy consumption for heating and cooling due to the load reduction/shifting, and for increasing indoor thermal comfort due to the reduced indoor temperature fluctuations. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据