4.7 Article

Performance compromises of building-integrated and building-applied photovoltaics (BIPV and BAPV) in Brazilian airports

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 607-615

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.076

关键词

Grid-connected photovoltaics; Building-integrated photovoltaic systems (BIPV); Building-applied photovoltaic systems (BAPV); Impact and performance of solar generators; Impact and aesthetic appeal of BIPV

资金

  1. Brazilian Research Council/CNPq
  2. National University of Singapore (NUS)
  3. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Singapore through the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Civil aviation is a large and growing contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. The airports that host commercial flights are often national landmarks and architectural showcases. They are typically large, horizontal and free of shading, and are also ideally suited for the integration of photovoltaic (PV) systems for onsite generation of clean and renewable electricity. While ground-mounted PV generators should be designed for optimum performance, PV systems integrated on buildings should also consider aesthetics. We have analysed building-applied and building-integrated PV systems (BAPV and BIPV). In BAPV, optimised PV module orientation and tilt angles were proposed for maximum annual output, while in BIPV, modules were accommodated respecting the existing architecture of airport buildings. Two Brazilian airports were analysed, comparing the performance of BAPV and BIPV using two off-the-shelf PV technologies. On average, both the installed peak power and the energy generation density were found to be higher for BIPV (100% and 87%, respectively), while the final annual energy yield was 7% higher for BAPV. A compromise of pleasant integration and small energy losses was reached, which can assist in convincing clients and the public more than an ideally tilted and oriented PV generator that impacts negatively on the building's aesthetics. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据