4.8 Article

Model parameter estimation approach based on incremental analysis for lithium-ion batteries without using open circuit voltage

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 108-118

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.037

关键词

Lithium-ion battery model; Online parameter estimation; Incremental analysis; Auto regressive exogenous (ARX); Open-circuit voltage

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA11A229]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program (SRFDP) of Higher Education [20090073120051]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51277121]
  4. U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center Clean Vehicles Consortium (CERC-CVC) [2010DFA72760-305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the suitability of lithium-ion battery model under varying scenarios, such as fluctuating temperature and SoC variation, dynamic model with parameters updated realtime should be developed. In this paper, an incremental analysis-based auto regressive exogenous (I-ARX) modeling method is proposed to eliminate the modeling error caused by the OCV effect and improve the accuracy of parameter estimation. Then, its numerical stability, modeling error, and parametric sensitivity are analyzed at different sampling rates (0.02, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 s). To identify the model parameters recursively, a bias-correction recursive least squares (CRLS) algorithm is applied. Finally, the pseudo random binary sequence (PRBS) and urban dynamic driving sequences (UDDSs) profiles are performed to verify the realtime performance and robustness of the newly proposed model and algorithm. Different sampling rates (1 Hz and 10 Hz) and multiple temperature points (5, 25, and 45 degrees C) are covered in our experiments. The experimental and simulation results indicate that the proposed I-ARX model can present high accuracy and suitability for parameter identification without using open circuit voltage. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据