4.8 Article

High-performance LiFePO4/C electrode with polytetrafluoroethylene as an aqueous-based binder

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 292-298

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.074

关键词

Lithium iron phosphate; Aqueous-based binder; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Electrochemical properties

资金

  1. Chinese National 973 Program [2015CB251100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472032, 51202083]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0044]
  4. Special Fund of Beijing Co-construction Project
  5. BIT Scientific and Technological Innovation Project [2013CX01003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An environmental-friendly and low-cost polymer, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) has been applied as an aqueous-based binder for the fabrication of LiFePO4/C electrode. The electrode with FITE has been compared to the electrode with the conventional binder, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) via Rheology test, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical tests. The Rheology test indicates that the viscosity of the slurry prepared with PTFE as a binder is better than that prepared with PVDF. The electrochemical measurements demonstrate that the electrode with PTFE binder displays a higher discharge capacity of 161.1 mAh g(-1) compared to the electrode with PVDF binder, which shows a discharge capacity of 150.7 mAh g(-1). The EIS analysis indicates the LiFePO4/C electrode with PTFE binder shows a higher ionic conductivity and a smaller increasing in charge transfer rate compared to the LiFePO4/C electrode with PVDF binder. In addition, the electrodes applying the aqueous-based binder have been optimized by controlling the moisture content in the electrodes. The electrochemical enhancement of these electrodes can be achieved by controlling the vacuum drying temperature and time during the preparation of the electrodes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据