4.7 Article

Results of the IEA Round Robin on Viscosity and Stability of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-oils

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 3769-3776

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef300384t

关键词

-

资金

  1. IEA Bioenergy Task 34: Natural Resources Canada
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, TEKES Finland, Fachagentur Nachwaachsende Rohstoffe e.V. Germany
  3. Department of Energy and Climate Change, U.K.
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J017302/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/J017302/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An international round robin study of the stability of fast pyrolysis bio-oil was undertaken. Fifteen laboratories in five different countries contributed. Two bio-oil samples were distributed to the laboratories for stability testing and further analysis. The stability test was defined in a method provided with the bio-oil samples. Viscosity measurement was a key input. The change in viscosity of a sealed sample of bio-oil held for 24 h at 80 degrees C was the defining element of stability. Subsequent analyses included ultimate analysis, density, moisture, ash, filterable solids, and TAN/pH determination, and gel permeation chromatography. The results showed that kinematic viscosity measurement was more generally conducted and more reproducibly performed versus dynamic viscosity measurement. The variation in the results of the stability test was great and a number of reasons for the variation were identified. The subsequent analyses proved to be at the level of reproducibility, as :found in earlier round robins on bio-oil analysis. Clearly, the analyses were more straightforward and reproducible with a bio-oil sample low in filterable solids (0.2%), compared to one with a higher (2%) solids loading. These results can be helpful in setting standards for use of bio-oil, which is just coming into the marketplace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据