4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Developing a Comprehensive Understanding and Model of Hydrate in Multiphase Flow: From Laboratory Measurements to Field Applications

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 4046-4052

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef300191e

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSM Hydrate Consortium
  2. BP
  3. Chevron
  4. Champion Technologies
  5. ConocoPhillips
  6. ExxonMobil
  7. Halliburton
  8. Multi-Chem
  9. Nalco
  10. Petrobras
  11. Schlumberger
  12. Shell
  13. SPT Group
  14. Statoil
  15. Total

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas hydrates pose a major flow assurance problem in the production and transportation of oil and gas. Managing the formation of gas hydrates is central for safe and continuous operation. In this paper, we will provide an overview of the Center for Hydrate Research and its efforts toward a better understanding of the formation, agglomeration, and accumulation of hydrates in multiphase flow. This paper will discuss the projects in the Center for Hydrate Research aimed at quantifying how hydrates can be managed by first understanding the fundamental processes for nucleation, growth, agglomeration, deposition, and plugging, knowledge in these areas that has been accumulated over decades of research. While still a work in progress, significant advances have been made in describing the hydrate formation in oil-dominated, water-dominated, and gas-dominated systems. One of the end goals of our effort is to develop the knowledge and tools to manage hydrates, as opposed to avoidance, in the production and transportation of oil and gas. It is recognized that the ideas and concepts introduced here are solely based on the efforts at the Center for Hydrate Research with direct input from industry leaders in the field over decades; as such, there may be alternative views on the problem, but these are not considered here. However, the authors do not know of any published models that provide transient, multiphase prediction of hydrates in a flowline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据