4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Supporting Tungsten Oxide on Zirconia by Hydrothermal and Impregnation Methods and Its Use as a Catalyst To Reduce the Viscosity of Heavy Crude Oil

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 6518-6527

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef301064b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20906075]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation [PLN0907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tungsten oxide was supported on zirconia via hydrothermal and conventional impregnation methods and used as a catalyst to reduce the viscosity of heavy crude oil without the addition of water. Their properties and viscosity reduction activity were compared. X-ray diffraction and the Rietveld method were used to characterize the crystal structure and determine the phase composition. The properties of catalysts were also measured by N-2 adsorption-desorption, differential scanning calorimetry, a Hammett indicator, and ammonia temperature programmed desorption. Compared with the impregnation method, the hydrothermal method facilitates the formation of strong tungsten-zirconia interaction and promotes the diffusion of tungstate on zirconia, hence leading to better dispersed tungsten oxide, as well as more tetragonal zirconia and acid sites. Under the reaction conditions of 220 degrees C, 6 h, and 2 MPa, the Catalysts prepared via the hydrothermal-method exhibit higher viscosity reduction activity than those prepared by impregnation. It is found the catalytic activity mainly depends on the acidity of the catalyst. The catalyst containing 20 wt % tungsten prepared by the hydrothermal method can attain a viscosity reduction ratio of 82.2% and reduce the viscosity of oil from 5.74 Pa s (50 degrees C) to 1.02 Pa s. Different from the widely used aquathermolysis technique, the presence of water is not required and the viscosity of the treated oil will not regress, even over long periods of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据