4.7 Article

Combustion Characteristics and Soot Distributions of Neat Butanol and Neat Soybean Biodiesel

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 3192-3203

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef1017412

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FC26-05NT42634]
  2. DOE GATE Centers of Excellence [DE-FG26-05NT42622]
  3. National Natural Science Found of China [50976078]
  4. China Scholarship Council [[2009]3012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combustion characteristics and soot distributions of neat butanol and neat soybean biodiesel were explored in an optical constant-volume combustion chamber using natural flame luminosity and forward illumination light extinction methods under various ambient temperatures (800 and 1000 K) and oxygen concentrations (21%, 16%, 10.5%). Results demonstrated that butanol had a higher normalized peak pressure compared with the biodiesel. Soybean biodiesel autoignited earlier than butanol at 21% and 16% oxygen, while a reverse trend was found at 10.5% oxygen. The oxygen concentration had little effect on the autoignition timing for butanol when it was between 16% and 10.5% at 800-1000 K. The natural flame luminosity reduced with lowered oxygen concentration and the flame distribution was notably increased at 10.5% oxygen. At 800 K ambient temperature, there was no soot formation detected for butanol, while the net soot release for soybean biodiesel was reduced with the decrease of oxygen concentration. At 1000 K ambient temperature, the net soot release increased for both butanol and soybean biodiesel with the decrease of oxygen concentration. Compared with butanol, soybean biodiesel had a higher value of normalized time integrated soot mass (NTISM) under all conditions. The value of NTISM increased about 16 times from 800 to 1000 K for the soybean biodiesel at 10.5% oxygen, indicating that low oxygen concentration will deteriorate combustion and increase the difficulty of soot emissions control for the soybean biodiesel under a higher ambient temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据