4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Smart Water as a Wettability Modifier in Chalk: The Effect of Salinity and Ionic Composition

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 2514-2519

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef901304m

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seawater can improve the water wetness of chalk at high temperatures, which improves the oil displacement by spontaneous imbibition of water. It is experimentally verified that the interaction between Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42- at the chalk surface will displace adsorbed carboxylic acids and increase the water wetness. In this work, the effect of salinity and ionic composition of smart water on oil recovery was studied at different temperatures, 100, 110, and 120 degrees C. The ultimate oil recovery was compared using seawater as the base fluid. When NaCl was removed from seawater, both the imbibition rate and oil recovery increased in comparison to seawater at the temperatures tested. At 110 and 120 degrees C, the oil recovery from seawater depleted in NaCl increased by about 10% of original oil in place (OOIP) compared to seawater. A decrease in oil recovery of about 5% of OOIP was observed when increasing the amount of NaCl in seawater 4 times. A systematic decrease in oil recovery was observed when using seawater diluted with distilled water as imbibing fluid. Imbibition tests at 110 degrees C showed that the water-wet fraction increased 29% for seawater depleted in NaCl compared to 11% for ordinary seawater. Diluted seawater to 10 000 ppm did not change wetting conditions at 110 degrees C. The results confirmed that not only is the concentration of the active ions Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42- important for wettability alteration to take place but also the amount of non-active salt, such as NaCl, has an impact on the wettability alteration process, which is discussed as a double-layer effect at the chalk surface. No significant improvement in the ultimate oil recovery was observed during forced displacement by modified seawater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据