4.7 Article

Comparative Study on Physicochemical Properties and Combustion Behaviors of Diesel Particulates and Model Soot

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 3778-3783

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef901366v

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20803093, 20833011, 20525621]
  2. Doctor Select Foundation for the University of State Education Ministry [200804251016]
  3. Beijing Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Foundation [YB 20091141401]
  4. 863 Program [2009AA06Z3488052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physicochemical properties and combustion characteristics of model soot (i.e., Printex U) and diesel particulates with different origins were compared. Their elemental composition and structures were determined using several kinds of techniques including element analysis, infrared spectroscopy (I R), X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and their different reactivities were measured by a number of temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO) experiments. It was found that the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of the particulates increased with the increase of the amount of adsorbed hydrocarbons. The main element components of model carbon were basically consistent with those of the practical diesel particulates, including C, H, O. etc. However, their element contents and surface properties were very different. The major ingredient of Printex U was carbon, and its content reached 92%; however, the carbon content of diesel particulates was about 65-74%, and the contents of O, H, and N in the diesel particulates were about 3-10 times as much as those of Printex U. TPO results showed that the diesel particulates could be more easily removed than Printex U by the combustion method, and the combustion temperatures for both Printex U and diesel particulates could be lowered when catalysts were present. Printex U is very well-suited as a kind of model soot for the study on the combustion performances of the soot fraction of diesel particulates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据