期刊
ENERGY & FUELS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 616-623出版社
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef900797e
关键词
-
资金
- Arkema/Ceca
Because of the stochastic character of hydrate crystallization, the evaluation of kinetic hydrate inhibitor (KHI) performance, using high-pressure autoclaves, is Subject to the substantial dispersion of experimental results. To overcome this problem, we proposed ill a previous paper (Duchateau et ill. Energy Fuels 2009, 23 (2), 962-966) a testing procedure based oil water memory. The residual Structures remaining in Solution after a prior hydrate formation/dissociation cycle act as hydrate precursors in the subsequent formation, which yields less-scattered results. The present work shows that the comparison between the subcoolings Delta T-sub,T-lim (difference between the hydrate equilibrium temperature and the crystallization temperature at hydrate reformation when a constant cooling rate is applied), measured With and Without an additive at hydrate formation is it convenient way to evaluate the potential of the additive to inhibit hydrate growth. It would also appear to be possible to rank the K H Is when the values of Delta T-sub,T-lim are compared. Oil the other hand, the comparison of the KHI effectiveness in terms of hold time (difference between the Onset of Catastrophic hydrate growth and file time at which the test solution enters time hydrate stability domain) at subcoolings lower than Delta T-sub,T-lim using file precursor test method should be made with caution.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据