4.8 Article

Stabilization of n-cadmium telluride photoanodes for water oxidation to O2(g) in aqueous alkaline electrolytes using amorphous TiO2 films formed by atomic-layer deposition

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 3334-3337

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ee01914h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis
  2. DOE Energy Innovation Hub
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0004993]
  4. National Science Foundation for support from an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  5. Beckman Institute Materials
  6. Laser Resource Centers
  7. NSF [CHE-1305124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although II-VI semiconductors such as CdS, CdTe, CdSe, ZnTe, and alloys thereof can have nearly ideal band gaps and band-edge positions for the production of solar fuels, II-VI photoanodes are well-known to be unstable towards photocorrosion or photopassivation when in contact with aqueous electrolytes. Atomic-layer deposition (ALD) of amorphous, leaky TiO2 films coated with thin films or islands of Ni oxide has been shown to robustly protect Si, GaAs, and other III-V materials from photocorrosion and therefore to facilitate the robust, solar-driven photoelectrochemical oxidation of H2O to O-2(g). We demonstrate herein that ALD-deposited 140 nm thick amorphous TiO2 films also effectively protect single crystalline n-CdTe photoanodes from corrosion or passivation. An n-CdTe/TiO2 electrode with a thin overlayer of a Ni-oxide based oxygen-evolution electrocatalyst produced 435 +/- 15 mV of photovoltage with a light-limited current density of 21 +/- 1 mA cm(-2) under 100 mW cm(-2) of simulated Air Mass 1.5 illumination. The ALD-deposited TiO2 films are highly optically transparent and electrically conductive. We show that an n-CdTe/TiO2/Ni oxide electrode enables the stable solar-driven oxidation of H2O to O-2(g) in strongly alkaline aqueous solutions, where passive, intrinsically safe, efficient systems for solar-driven water splitting can be operated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据