4.8 Review

Recent advances in alternative cathode materials for iodine-free dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 2003-2019

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ee40296g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA03Z218, 2011AA050522]
  2. International Cooperation S&T Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA64360, 2010DFA61410, 2011 DFA50530]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50672041, 51272126]
  4. Welch Foundation [C-1716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the last decades, iodine-free redox couples have been widely investigated as alternatives for the ubiquitous triiodide/iodide redox shuttle in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). This is mainly motivated by desires to overcome the disadvantages associated with the latter, such as large energy loss in the dye regeneration process, visible light absorption and corrosiveness towards current-collecting metal grids. However, conventional Pt cathodes show poor catalytic activity towards those iodine-free redox couples, resulting in poor fill factors and relatively moderate power conversion efficiencies. The ultimate solution to address this challenge is to develop alternative economical Pt-free catalysts. This review selectively discusses and summarizes the recent advances in novel cathode materials for electrolytes free of iodine-based redox couples, mainly including inorganic transition metal compounds, organic conductive polymers and carbonaceous materials (particularly carbon nanotubes and graphene). Most of these advances have been realized by judiciously controlling the morphology of nanomaterials or by utilizing the collective properties of nano-assembly systems. Finally, this review highlights the importance of matchup between catalysts and the redox couples, and points to crucial issues that should be addressed in the pursuit of developing low-cost and high-catalytic cathodes for DSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据