4.7 Article

An adaptive dynamic short-term wind speed forecasting model using secondary decomposition and an improved regularized extreme learning machine

期刊

ENERGY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 939-957

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.180

关键词

Short-term wind speed forecasting; Decomposition-ensemble forecasting model; Secondary decomposition; Backtracking search optimization algorithm; Regularized extreme learning machine; Adaptive forecasting

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0402205, 2017YFC0405900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91547208, 51579107, 91647114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate and reliable multi-step wind speed forecasting is extremely crucial for the economic and safe operation of power systems. A novel dynamic hybrid model, which combines an adaptive secondary decomposition (ASD), a leave-one-out cross-validation-based regularized extreme learning machine (LRELM) and the backtracking search algorithm (BSA), is proposed to mitigate the practical difficulties of the traditional decomposition-ensemble forecasting models (DEFMs) through adaptive dynamic decomposing and modeling when new data is added. The new ASD method, which fuses ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), adaptive variational mode decomposition (AVMD) with sample entropy (SE), is developed for smoothing the raw series to reduce computational time as well as enhance generalization and stability of forecasting models. BSA is employed to optimize LRELM to overcome the drawback of instability. To validate its efficacy, the proposed model and thirteen benchmark models are compared by diverse lead-time forecasting of several real cases. Comprehensive comparisons with a coherent set of indices suggest that the proposed model is an effective and powerful tool for short-term wind speed forecasting not only from the perspective of reliability and sharpness but also from the view of overall skills. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据